Researchers Say the Social Web Improves Kids' Literacy (Geeks Say 'Duh')
Written by Jolie O'Dell / December 3, 2009 7:20 PM / 3 Comments
According to a recent survey of around 3,000 kids, those who text, blog and use social sites such as Facebook have better writing skills than their less technologically inclined counterparts.
This hardly comes as a surprise to us tech geeks who spent our younger days alternating between writing critical theses on esoteric forums and getting assaulted by grammar Nazis on said forums. Although we may take it for granted that voluminous written communication online builds writing skills, others decry the lack of formality in most tween and teen lexicons. Is "text speak" as much a concern as enhanced writing skills are a benefit?
Of the children surveyed - a group of 3,001 young people between the ages of 9 and 16 - 24 percent maintained a personal blog and 82 percent regularly sent text messages. Seventy-three percent used IM clients to chat online.
When researchers asked the children to rate their writing skills, 47 percent of those who were non-bloggers and didn't use social networking sites said that their writing skills were good. The online set projected higher levels of confidence; of those who maintained blogs, 61 percent said their writing was good or very good.
Jonathan Douglas, director of the National Literacy Trust, told BBC News, "Our research suggests a strong correlation between kids using technology and wider patterns of reading and writing."
He continued to say that online engagement can lead to offline creativity, such as story writing and song composition.
And what about the "LOL OMG c u l8r" informality of text and chat communiqués?
"Our research results are conclusive," said Douglas. "The more forms of communications children use the stronger their core literary skills." Or at least, the more children are accustomed to using the written word, the more confident and comfortable they will be with written communication in general.
Posted inMainstream Web Watch and tagged with
blog, children, internet, kids, literacy, social network
Print This Digg Share
Related Entries
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts
There's sort of a selection bias in the study, wouldn't you say? It could be that social technology improves literacy, or it could be that kids with higher literacy rates are more likely to use social technology. The study itself can only indicate that the kids using social technology have higher than average literacy, it can't tell us what direction causation flows.
Posted by: Adam Gurri
Indeed, a longitudinal study that compares how children's writing and reading skills change before and after using social networks might be more reliable. But then, any improvement might just be due to the children's natural maturing/aging process.
Also, using children's self-reports as a way to gauge their writing and reading skills doesn't seem to be the most accurate way to do it.
Posted by: Zachary Lin Zhao
I have read the article based on the Social Web improves the performance and aptitude of the children.Social websites such a forum and blog comments which increase the capacity of building the mind and the literacy levels.This post really creates the good awareness among all others.I want to know suggestion from others.
Posted by: tee | December 3, 2009 8:33 PM
FOLLOW @RWW ON TWITTER
POPULAR TAGS
- iphone
- search
- mobile
- microsoft
- social media
- trends
- apple
- music
- yahoo
- youtube
- video
- myspace
- advertising
- amazon
- firefox
- social networking
- rss
- android
- semantic web
- friendfeed
- social networks
- security
- mobile web
- privacy
- blogging
- digg
- politics
- developers
- data portability
- enterprise
- chrome
- marketing
- adobe
- api
- social web
- wikipedia
- mozilla
- news
- apps
- flickr
- browsers
- gmail
- ebooks
- lifestreaming
- cloud computing
- events
TEXT LINK ADS
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Researchers Say the Social Web Improves Kids' Literacy (Geeks Say 'Duh')
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment